Just Africa

Ist Africa HOT?

The scene is set, but the dialogue is not. Bruno sits at the front of a Texas talk show with his new African baby, describing himself as a single parent who thought it would be ‘a cool idea.’ The predominantly African-American crowd is outraged and, when asked why he adopted the child, he attributes the idea to people like Brangelina and Madonna: “And now Bruno has one.” The scene was, undoubtedly, absolutely hysterical - but by satirizing this well-known issue, the film also takes a courageous step in attacking such famous celebrities, a major departure from the usual reporters and journalists (the apparent intellectuals) who simply hail them for doing so many “great things to save Africa.”

 

Last week, comedian Sacha Baron Cohen released his new mockumentary film Brüno, in which he portrays an Austrian fashionista who will stop at nothing to become famous (not entirely unlike many of the interviewed characters in the movie). Cohen is known for his outlandish characters that satirize societal issues by filming ordinary people who are unaware they are in a major motion picture. In this particular case, Africa gets airtime “because it’s gotten popular." Bruno displays this idea more explicitly when he meets with two ditzy blondes from an L.A. PR firm who pronounce Darfur as “Da-four” (followed by a “Da-five” joke), and confirm that Africa is a ‘hot topic’ right now. 

Looking past the obscenities and absolute craziness of the entire film, Baron Cohen makes an interesting – and important - point about Africa in the sense that this continent, made up of approximately 1 billion people from several thousand ethnic groups, has somehow managed to become a ‘fad.’ Charities for Darfur are strongly endorsed by George Clooney; Oprah Winfrey has a fund in South Africa for educating children; Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie had their child, Shiloh, in Namibia and, in turn, donated $300,000 for a hospital. And the list goes on. While all these efforts sound admirable, why is it that no celebrities are rushing to endorse poor or homeless Americans? Well now, that would just be condescending, right? So why is it we can do this with Africans?  

I find it to be utterly demeaning that we, as fellow human beings, can allow this many people and this many cultures of such a huge continent to be reduced to a charitable effort because of such a strong disconnect.

On the other hand, the issues many African countries are facing do require publicity and it cannot be argued that certain celebrities (whether it should be the case or not) have a lot of pull with the general population, more so than most politicians. But does it have to be done by ‘charitizing’ cultures? By making Africa simply a hot new trend, people often seek to follow in the footsteps of celebrities without fully understanding the issues. In addition, these do-good celebs are only furthering stereotypes about Africa  (like constant war and lack of education), perpetuating an ‘us and them’ divide. Then again, are politicians any better or more knowledgeable about African issues? Nancy Pelosi can pick up the phone and call African experts just as easily as Bono can.

But what's even worse, the celebrity culture that infuses the desire to “give back” to Africa reinforces the idea that Africans don’t have a wealth of knowledge and perspectives about how to solve problems on their own, without the gracious philanthropists of the West. Where is the investment in African knowledge and better yet, what can we learn from them? Rather than blindly following a cause as a result of George Clooney’s good looks or sending malaria-preventing bed nets because it’s ‘the cool thing’, what would be so difficult about taking a second to read about the issues, where you may find that investment in say local production of bed nets would simultaneously prevent the disease as well as contribute to building infrastructure. Why swoop in and adopt children from all over the continent when hundreds of thousands are left behind and in conditions that need to be addressed? Never mind how African adoptions are reminiscent of imperial and colonial eras, when Africa was considered a place extremely different from other “civilized” places on Earth, and whose people needed to be collected and studied in order to figure out how best to “advance” them. These are the sentiments that seem to not only be subconsciously perpetuated, but are being widely and enthusiastically praised.

Cambridge-educated Baron Cohen once stated, “I remember, when I was in university I studied history, and there was this one major historian of the Third Reich, Ian Kershaw. And his quote was, ‘The path to Auschwitz was paved with indifference.’ I know it is not very funny being a comedian talking about the Holocaust, but I think it’s an interesting idea that not everyone in Germany had to be a raving anti-Semite. They just had to be apathetic.” Perhaps this could be said about Africa as well.  It is not that people are against helping Africa; they just turn the other cheek. So I suppose it is true that maybe it doesn’t matter who it is that makes people look twice, just as long as they do. But has all this celebrity attention really made people any more educated about the actual issues, or is it just that "Africa 'ist hot?'"

Bruno’s attempt at fame through Africa did not work in the film, but however outrageous, the film is provocative when it comes to commentary on Africa and is a push in the right direction for getting truly informed – and having a good laugh while you do it.

By Laura Martin, Executive Office Intern, Africa Action

Getting ‘Reel’ About Africa’s Debt

“Imagine your creditors tripled the interest they demanded on your loans without warning and then all of a sudden, all at once, called the loans in.” ~ 'Vulture Funds Policy Alert, TransAfrica Forum'

Yes, the topic of Africa’s debt is thankfully back in the news in a big way, with the reintroduction of the “Stop VULTURE Funds” Act (H.R. 2932) last Thursday, June 18, by Representative Maxine Waters (D-CA). Building on the aims of a similar bill introduced in August 2008, the act now before Congress seeks to outlaw the profiteering by private equity or hedge funds in the U.S. at the expense of some of the world’s poorest nations. [ Africa Action Press Release]

Activists and campaigners celebrated this important step in opposition to particular subset of funds that target distressed sovereign debt - buying up the debt of poor countries from either a government or commercial creditor. Vulture Funds' apparently clawing (no pun intended) desire to make a profit – profits reaching into the tens of millions of dollars – siphon much-needed funding away from initiatives like health care, education, combating HIV/AIDS, clean water access etc. in impoverished countries.

Unfamiliar with Vulture Funds and the controversy surrounding them? Here are some quick facts from Jubilee USA’s Vulture Fund Backgrounder:

“A ‘vulture fund’ is a company that buys up the debt of poor countries at a big discount from the original owner with the purpose of suing the indebted country in court once it has some money (often after debt cancellation)”

“…Donegal International, got hold of $15 million from Zambia, money that was freed up by debt relief and should have been used for the fight against HIV/AIDS and poverty. Zambia was not alone: A 2007 report on vulture funds by IMF staff showed that 11 out of 24 poor countries approached said they were involved in litigation worth a total of $1.8 billion with 46 creditors.”

From JUBILEE Debt Campaign UK:

“These companies tend to be quite secretive, and very many of them are based in tax havens. Some are owned by large (often US-based) financial institutions such as hedge funds. In other cases, there is no information on who owns them. Often companies are set up simply to pursue one debt, then shut down again.”

Jubilee USA’s Briefing Note also points out that in Niger, “lawsuit costs were 52.2 percent of health and education expenditure,” and 98.3 percent of Cameroon’s budget revenue ($51.7 million).

The Congressional Representatives supporting the bill have drawn a line in the sand, standing on the side of Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC), and they are certainly not the only ones lending a voice to the cries of discontent over Africa’s debt situation. These issues have also been explored in more popular realms as well, where the message may not be in technical terms or political jargon, but attempt to start dialogue over Africa’s urgent debt issues.

Enter Bamako: Abderrahmane Sissako’s 2006 film, whose foundation is the exploration of the crippling debt, poverty, and social injustice facing many African countries.

 

With a plot both original in its premise and powerful in the questions that it raises, Bamako immediately came to my mind because, in many ways, it calls for the changes in Africa’s debt situation that activists have been working on and which has culminated in the Vulture Funds bill.

The central storyline follows a trial in which the citizens of Mali charge that the policies of the defendants, the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF), have greatly hurt, rather than improved, the socio-economic and political stability of the country. Using real judges and attorneys (who wrote their own dialogue), as well as regular, Malian citizens as witnesses – invited to improvise their testimonies – the result is a film that is much more than a courtroom drama, played out in the dusty courtyard of a Bamako household. In an interview with Sight & Sound, Sissako pointed out that “Victims in Africa don’t need inventing…Just go out on the street and they’re there.” And, truly, the people and their representatives are frank in relating their grievances surrounding such ills as privatized water, education, medicine, and other social services, ultimately questioning the sincerity of such institutions’ claims to want to improve developing courtiers.

Arguably, the power of the film lies in the line it walks between reality and fiction. The possibility of seeking to hold the actions of The World Bank and IMF accountable to the Africans on the ground, who are the ones who suffer from the exploitation of illegitimate debt and poor social and economic program planning, further highlights the power imbalance at play (since deep down, a part of us knows such a trial could never happen). And, in between debates and testimonies, is the interplay and interjection of everyday life in Mali – the people around the neighborhood who pay avid attention to the trial’s broadcast on the radio, and the others who are distracted, indifferent, getting married, or working all day. The documentary style of filming only increases the feeling that you are watching a case of immediate, real-world concern, yet the undercurrent of Sissako’s film is the near-futility of attacking such a colossus of a predicament.

Unlike other movies where a trial figures prominently in the plot, there is no final verdict handed down in Bamako and the film’s conclusion becomes a sign that it is less about the decision that could come from such a trial (or even whether such institutions should be put on trial), and more about educating those who watch. Is globalization the solution to Africa’s problems? Is foreign aid to the continent actually easing poverty? And, honestly, why would the World Bank, IMF, and even other wealthy nations want to perpetuate the terrible conditions of poverty, hunger, illiteracy that plague many of Africa’s nations? (a question even asked by a lawyer for the World Bank in the film).  Sissako’s work asks us to think carefully about these questions if we haven’t before, and to not only see the disconnect between the aims of these financial institutions and the reality of Malian life, but to try and find some hope in resolving these issues.

With the reintroduction of the “Stop VULTURE Funds” Act, with additional co-sponsors and even more momentum behind it, the aims of advocates and activists have now been placed into the hands of the highest government officials in the country. It couldn’t come at more needed time, with the economic downturn hitting poor countries hard and world hunger recently hitting the 1 billion mark – the vast sums of money Vulture Funds seek is badly needed by citizens of the impoverished nations they target. Could it be that we will see change step off the silver screen and into the real world? Only time will tell.

Check out Bamako – on DVD now, and Africa Action’s resource pages for more information on Africa’s Debt and Vulture Funds.

<